Lance Concannon on ‘Stuck between an elephant and an 800lb gorilla’

Posted by Lance Concannon
on 4th May 2010
Bookmark and Share

elephantIf you’ll forgive me mashing up a couple of trite metaphors, we need to talk about social media monitoring – because right now we’re sharing a room with both an elephant and an 800lb gorilla.

I’ll start with the elephant: current social media monitoring services are not good enough. The three main problems with them are:

1) Pricing – pricing structures are complex and if you have sophisticated, constantly evolving monitoring requirements it can be difficult to manage costs.

2) Limited breadth – some monitoring services use their own crawler technology to scan the web, others buy their data in from a third party. Either way, you’re often only getting a limited, incomplete view of the web in your monitoring results.

3) Spam – spam filtering in many social media monitoring tools is very poor, so the results feature a lot of junk rather than genuine conversations about your brand. Consequently, all those lovely charts and graphs in your reports are based on inaccurate data.

To make matters worse, the automated sentiment analysis technology that social media monitoring sales people often like to tout as a key feature is wildly inaccurate; the technology just isn’t strong enough yet.

None of this should be taken to mean that social media monitoring tools are completely useless. Despite these failings, in organisations where there is little social media expertise monitoring tools can help the comms team to build a picture of online conversations and better inform their decision making.

But the market is confused and fragmented. There are dozens of monitoring tools, lots of different pricing models and extremely variable quality of results. Clients may feel comforted by buying into a big-name monitoring solution, but spend some time trying out the lesser known solutions at the lower end of the market and you may be left wondering how the massive price difference is justified.

394064847_3b738c6527_bEnter the Gorilla

If you want somebody to give you the most comprehensive view of brand conversations on the web, do a good job of filtering out spam and provide powerful analytics tools, you would be hard pressed to find anybody better positioned to do so than Google.

It would be a trivial matter for the company to build a class leading brand monitoring tool and, in all likelihood, it would make any such tool available free of charge, probably integrated with other tools such as Ad Planner or Insights.

Regardless of whether Google enters this space or not, the industry is crying out for standardisation of social media monitoring tools and metrics. Standardisation leads to commoditisation, which in turn drives down prices.

At the moment social media monitoring is largely an issue of trying to pick the right tool from an ocean of confusing options, when really it should be about having the skills to correctly interpret and act upon results that you can have confidence in.

Lance Concannon is the UK Social Media Lead at Text 100, a global public relations consultancy. You can follow him on Twitter here: http://www.twitter.com/concannon. Images via exfordy’s Flickr stream and that of

Recent comments
  • dominiq
    Lance,

    Great article. I frankly think that "monitoring everything" and "automatic sentiment" are not only impossible (even Google only indexes a fraction of the web) but also wrong paradigms for social media.

    It's like desiring becoming friends with a few billion people. (Dunbar number story, one can only really listen to 150 people). You don't build up influence and trust without a message, a position and a focus.

    We offer a different approach: 1) THINK, build a strategy and decide who you focus on (your target communities) and what you want to do with them.
    2) MAP: We find, aggregate, map, qualify to 1000's people WHO MATTERS, cross platform 3) We provide capabilities to listen and engage with these key communities and influencers.

    This focus prevent us from spam (by the way spam free is a web1.0 praradigm - when 100's of millions of people are writing, non relevant discussions are as harmful as spam).
    This focus enables impact ( you end up knowing and having repetitive discussions with the same relevant people)
    This focus enables management i.e your activity and workload is not allocated based on the result of a search engine and if you've only 1 hour so spend daily, you spend it with the people that matter.

    If you're interesting to explore, just email and we'll find time to discuss.


  • Lance,

    Would you be interested in a demo of Sysomos' Heartbeat social media monitoring service? It does a great job of addressing the three problems that you highlighted.

    Mark

    Mark Evans
    Director of Commuications
    Sysomos Inc.
blog comments powered by Disqus