<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fernando Rizo on &#8216;Three things I&#8217;d do if Vodafone was my client&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reputationonline.co.uk/2010/02/08/fernando-rizo-on-three-things-id-do-if-vodafone-was-my-client/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reputationonline.co.uk/2010/02/08/fernando-rizo-on-three-things-id-do-if-vodafone-was-my-client/</link>
	<description>Reputationonline.co.uk weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:38:12 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: How (not) to respond to an online PR crisis (cc ITVfootball) &#171; Waddingham&#39;s words (and pics)</title>
		<link>http://reputationonline.co.uk/2010/02/08/fernando-rizo-on-three-things-id-do-if-vodafone-was-my-client/comment-page-1/#comment-2218</link>
		<dc:creator>How (not) to respond to an online PR crisis (cc ITVfootball) &#171; Waddingham&#39;s words (and pics)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reputationonline.co.uk/?p=2684#comment-2218</guid>
		<description>[...] tried this approach, and whilst the way they did it wasn&#8217;t perfect, it was better than [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tried this approach, and whilst the way they did it wasn&#8217;t perfect, it was better than [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vodafone and *that* Twitter message &#171; Paul Stallard&#39;s Technology PR Agency Blog</title>
		<link>http://reputationonline.co.uk/2010/02/08/fernando-rizo-on-three-things-id-do-if-vodafone-was-my-client/comment-page-1/#comment-2025</link>
		<dc:creator>Vodafone and *that* Twitter message &#171; Paul Stallard&#39;s Technology PR Agency Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reputationonline.co.uk/?p=2684#comment-2025</guid>
		<description>[...] they are taking this mishap with his detailed explanation of their actions in response to the Reputation Online blog from earlier this week. I also thought that it was interesting that Jakub, head of web [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] they are taking this mishap with his detailed explanation of their actions in response to the Reputation Online blog from earlier this week. I also thought that it was interesting that Jakub, head of web [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NEWS: Vodafone explains rogue tweet &#124; Xbox360 News</title>
		<link>http://reputationonline.co.uk/2010/02/08/fernando-rizo-on-three-things-id-do-if-vodafone-was-my-client/comment-page-1/#comment-1945</link>
		<dc:creator>NEWS: Vodafone explains rogue tweet &#124; Xbox360 News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 06:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reputationonline.co.uk/?p=2684#comment-1945</guid>
		<description>[...] The company immediately posted an apology, but the message immediately shot around the globe.?Jakub Hrabovsky, head of web relations at Vodafone, has now explained exactly what happened - telling ReputationOnline: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The company immediately posted an apology, but the message immediately shot around the globe.?Jakub Hrabovsky, head of web relations at Vodafone, has now explained exactly what happened &#8211; telling ReputationOnline: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReputationOnline</title>
		<link>http://reputationonline.co.uk/2010/02/08/fernando-rizo-on-three-things-id-do-if-vodafone-was-my-client/comment-page-1/#comment-1935</link>
		<dc:creator>ReputationOnline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reputationonline.co.uk/?p=2684#comment-1935</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve also had a call from Jakub Hrabovsky, Head of Web Relations at Vodafone. He&#039;s given us the following further explanation of Friday&#039;s events:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Since the inappropriate tweet that was published through @VodafoneUK on Friday there have been many questions and theories (some slightly wild) about what actually happened. Therefore, we can now share what actually took place.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On Friday one of the members of the Web Relations team who was moderating the company Twitter account left his computer for a minute to ask a colleague some advice. Another member of staff who is unconnected with the Web Relations team saw his colleagues screen open and assuming it was his colleague’s personal Twitter account posted the inappropriate tweet.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Within minutes we realised what had happened and issued an apology. The individual who posted the tweet was suspended with immediate effect and an internal investigation is now underway. We have strict guidelines with respect to all the social media we use and we are naturally upset that a rogue incidence like this could happen.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#39;ve also had a call from Jakub Hrabovsky, Head of Web Relations at Vodafone. He&#39;s given us the following further explanation of Friday&#39;s events:</p>
<p>&#8220;Since the inappropriate tweet that was published through @VodafoneUK on Friday there have been many questions and theories (some slightly wild) about what actually happened. Therefore, we can now share what actually took place.  </p>
<p>On Friday one of the members of the Web Relations team who was moderating the company Twitter account left his computer for a minute to ask a colleague some advice. Another member of staff who is unconnected with the Web Relations team saw his colleagues screen open and assuming it was his colleague’s personal Twitter account posted the inappropriate tweet.  </p>
<p>Within minutes we realised what had happened and issued an apology. The individual who posted the tweet was suspended with immediate effect and an internal investigation is now underway. We have strict guidelines with respect to all the social media we use and we are naturally upset that a rogue incidence like this could happen.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention ReputationOnline » Blog Archive » Fernando Rizo on ‘Three things I’d do if Vodafone was my client’ -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://reputationonline.co.uk/2010/02/08/fernando-rizo-on-three-things-id-do-if-vodafone-was-my-client/comment-page-1/#comment-1938</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention ReputationOnline » Blog Archive » Fernando Rizo on ‘Three things I’d do if Vodafone was my client’ -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reputationonline.co.uk/?p=2684#comment-1938</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by James Whatley, Vikki Chowney, Martin, Jonathan Hopkins, Jon Silk and others. Jon Silk said: Check out Vodafone&#039;s explanation of last week&#039;s dodgy tweet http://bit.ly/cujgLc - so why did the offender post something about voda? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by James Whatley, Vikki Chowney, Martin, Jonathan Hopkins, Jon Silk and others. Jon Silk said: Check out Vodafone&#39;s explanation of last week&#39;s dodgy tweet <a href="http://bit.ly/cujgLc" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cujgLc</a> &#8211; so why did the offender post something about voda? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fernando Rizo</title>
		<link>http://reputationonline.co.uk/2010/02/08/fernando-rizo-on-three-things-id-do-if-vodafone-was-my-client/comment-page-1/#comment-1932</link>
		<dc:creator>Fernando Rizo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reputationonline.co.uk/?p=2684#comment-1932</guid>
		<description>Dan, I think you guys did really well over all with the situation and as I said, it could have happened to any company. Very cool of you to drop in and post in this thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, I think you guys did really well over all with the situation and as I said, it could have happened to any company. Very cool of you to drop in and post in this thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Pack</title>
		<link>http://reputationonline.co.uk/2010/02/08/fernando-rizo-on-three-things-id-do-if-vodafone-was-my-client/comment-page-1/#comment-1931</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reputationonline.co.uk/?p=2684#comment-1931</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Dan on the advisability of doing lots of @ replies. One general tweet would have quickly slipped down most people&#039;s streams, with a high risk of not being seen (especially given the late Friday timing). @ replies means people who have complained to you will almost certainly see your response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m with Dan on the advisability of doing lots of @ replies. One general tweet would have quickly slipped down most people&#39;s streams, with a high risk of not being seen (especially given the late Friday timing). @ replies means people who have complained to you will almost certainly see your response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ciaran</title>
		<link>http://reputationonline.co.uk/2010/02/08/fernando-rizo-on-three-things-id-do-if-vodafone-was-my-client/comment-page-1/#comment-1930</link>
		<dc:creator>Ciaran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reputationonline.co.uk/?p=2684#comment-1930</guid>
		<description>The definitive comment on this whole sorry mess: &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/a9Tzvo&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/a9Tzvo&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The definitive comment on this whole sorry mess: <a href="http://bit.ly/a9Tzvo" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/a9Tzvo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Whatley</title>
		<link>http://reputationonline.co.uk/2010/02/08/fernando-rizo-on-three-things-id-do-if-vodafone-was-my-client/comment-page-1/#comment-1929</link>
		<dc:creator>James Whatley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reputationonline.co.uk/?p=2684#comment-1929</guid>
		<description>Well said and well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said and well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danbowsher</title>
		<link>http://reputationonline.co.uk/2010/02/08/fernando-rizo-on-three-things-id-do-if-vodafone-was-my-client/comment-page-1/#comment-1927</link>
		<dc:creator>danbowsher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reputationonline.co.uk/?p=2684#comment-1927</guid>
		<description>Hi Fernando&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With an investigation currently underway, you’ll appreciate I can’t go into the precise details regarding what happened last Friday. That said you raise some interesting points that I wanted to respond to.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We’ve been running @VodafoneUK as a customer support channel for over 7 months and it’s had a positive impact on our customers. We’ve got an experienced team working to provide online customer service across Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and our own eForum. We also have a clear set of social media guidelines for employees which were clearly breached in this case.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We take Friday’s incident very seriously, which is why we immediately suspended the person responsible. For the record, this person was not a member of our Web Relations team, who have worked throughout the weekend to ensure the Twitter profile resumed normal service as soon as possible. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Our immediate concern on Friday was to re-assure our followers that this tweet was not acceptable to Vodafone and to minimise the impact on the customer support services that deliver through Twitter as soon as possible.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The offensive message was removed immediately and an apology message was posted and followed by individual replies to followers who had expressed concern over the original Tweet. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While some commentators have accused us of spamming by adopting this approach, others (including members of the media, PR and marketing professionals) have praised us for addressing individual Tweeters directly. Under these circumstances there are no hard and fast rules, but given the need to respond swiftly and effectively, we chose the best approach immediately available to us.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Being consistent is a fundamental part of our Twitter engagement. If a customer contacts us through the @VodafoneUK channel, we will engage with them individually. Whether we’re dealing with a major reputational issue or not, we believe the majority of our followers would expect us to stick to this approach. Equally, we couldn’t afford to be in a position where one solitary response to the incident from @VodafoneUK was lost amongst the other Re-Tweets of the obscene Tweet. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We’re still committed to the use of Twitter as a channel for delivering customer support and are always looking for ways in which to enhance our online support services. We’ll take onboard the learnings from last week and we will absolutely use the experience to fine tune our approach moving forward. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dan.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dan Bowsher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Fernando</p>
<p>With an investigation currently underway, you’ll appreciate I can’t go into the precise details regarding what happened last Friday. That said you raise some interesting points that I wanted to respond to.</p>
<p>We’ve been running @VodafoneUK as a customer support channel for over 7 months and it’s had a positive impact on our customers. We’ve got an experienced team working to provide online customer service across Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and our own eForum. We also have a clear set of social media guidelines for employees which were clearly breached in this case.</p>
<p>We take Friday’s incident very seriously, which is why we immediately suspended the person responsible. For the record, this person was not a member of our Web Relations team, who have worked throughout the weekend to ensure the Twitter profile resumed normal service as soon as possible. </p>
<p>Our immediate concern on Friday was to re-assure our followers that this tweet was not acceptable to Vodafone and to minimise the impact on the customer support services that deliver through Twitter as soon as possible.</p>
<p>The offensive message was removed immediately and an apology message was posted and followed by individual replies to followers who had expressed concern over the original Tweet. </p>
<p>While some commentators have accused us of spamming by adopting this approach, others (including members of the media, PR and marketing professionals) have praised us for addressing individual Tweeters directly. Under these circumstances there are no hard and fast rules, but given the need to respond swiftly and effectively, we chose the best approach immediately available to us.</p>
<p>Being consistent is a fundamental part of our Twitter engagement. If a customer contacts us through the @VodafoneUK channel, we will engage with them individually. Whether we’re dealing with a major reputational issue or not, we believe the majority of our followers would expect us to stick to this approach. Equally, we couldn’t afford to be in a position where one solitary response to the incident from @VodafoneUK was lost amongst the other Re-Tweets of the obscene Tweet. </p>
<p>We’re still committed to the use of Twitter as a channel for delivering customer support and are always looking for ways in which to enhance our online support services. We’ll take onboard the learnings from last week and we will absolutely use the experience to fine tune our approach moving forward. </p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Dan.</p>
<p>Dan Bowsher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
