<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Loft bribes bloggers for positive coverage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reputationonline.co.uk/2010/02/04/loft-bribes-bloggers-for-positive-coverage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reputationonline.co.uk/2010/02/04/loft-bribes-bloggers-for-positive-coverage/</link>
	<description>Reputationonline.co.uk weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:38:12 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cool stuff &#8211; February 8, 2010 &#8212; Danny Whatmough.com</title>
		<link>http://reputationonline.co.uk/2010/02/04/loft-bribes-bloggers-for-positive-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-1928</link>
		<dc:creator>Cool stuff &#8211; February 8, 2010 &#8212; Danny Whatmough.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reputationonline.co.uk/?p=2663#comment-1928</guid>
		<description>[...] tweets as a source? February 6, 2010 Who should provide social media marketing? February 5, 2010 Loft bribes bloggers for positive coverage February 4, 2010 Voucher Cloud: iPhone app review February 4, 2010 Gartner predicts most IT-led [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tweets as a source? February 6, 2010 Who should provide social media marketing? February 5, 2010 Loft bribes bloggers for positive coverage February 4, 2010 Voucher Cloud: iPhone app review February 4, 2010 Gartner predicts most IT-led [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annemarie</title>
		<link>http://reputationonline.co.uk/2010/02/04/loft-bribes-bloggers-for-positive-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-1923</link>
		<dc:creator>Annemarie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 03:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reputationonline.co.uk/?p=2663#comment-1923</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve also seen Loft pay for advertising (not PR) on blogs, ie via banner (display ad) which ran in January 2010 and a competition on this site &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whowhatwear.com/website/full-article/on-a-side-note-whowhatwearcom-and-loft-new-year-new-you-sweepstakes/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.whowhatwear.com/website/full-article...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve also seen Loft pay for advertising (not PR) on blogs, ie via banner (display ad) which ran in January 2010 and a competition on this site <a href="http://www.whowhatwear.com/website/full-article/on-a-side-note-whowhatwearcom-and-loft-new-year-new-you-sweepstakes/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.whowhatwear.com/website/full-article.." rel="nofollow">http://www.whowhatwear.com/website/full-article..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samdeeks</title>
		<link>http://reputationonline.co.uk/2010/02/04/loft-bribes-bloggers-for-positive-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-1922</link>
		<dc:creator>samdeeks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 20:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reputationonline.co.uk/?p=2663#comment-1922</guid>
		<description>Good post!  I&#039;m not surprise, though - seems to me that social media just carries on what people in the real world started: doing whatever they could to make a profit and to hell with the ethics or the morality of it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Right now, we&#039;re still in the &#039;everybody in the world is trying to get rich online&#039; phase.  Social networks are choked with hustlers trying to sell their stuff or get an advantage.  In the end, it all comes down to how much you value your credibility and what risks you&#039;re prepared to take with it.  Some companies don&#039;t care; others simply don&#039;t understand the risk they&#039;re taking.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On a positive note, the transparency of social media means that it isn&#039;t long before people acting unethically get the finger pointed at them by people like us.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the other hand, I can&#039;t help wondering whether the number of people like us who even notice - let alone care about - what Loft was doing is decreasing all the time.  Frankly, Scarlett, my stepson probably couldn&#039;t give a damn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post!  I&#39;m not surprise, though &#8211; seems to me that social media just carries on what people in the real world started: doing whatever they could to make a profit and to hell with the ethics or the morality of it.</p>
<p>Right now, we&#39;re still in the &#39;everybody in the world is trying to get rich online&#39; phase.  Social networks are choked with hustlers trying to sell their stuff or get an advantage.  In the end, it all comes down to how much you value your credibility and what risks you&#39;re prepared to take with it.  Some companies don&#39;t care; others simply don&#39;t understand the risk they&#39;re taking.</p>
<p>On a positive note, the transparency of social media means that it isn&#39;t long before people acting unethically get the finger pointed at them by people like us.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I can&#39;t help wondering whether the number of people like us who even notice &#8211; let alone care about &#8211; what Loft was doing is decreasing all the time.  Frankly, Scarlett, my stepson probably couldn&#39;t give a damn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siany</title>
		<link>http://reputationonline.co.uk/2010/02/04/loft-bribes-bloggers-for-positive-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-1912</link>
		<dc:creator>Siany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 20:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reputationonline.co.uk/?p=2663#comment-1912</guid>
		<description>This happens more often than bloggers like to admit. But where do you draw the line? At a cash sum, or when you&#039;re get a gift or something to review? Everyone has their price and for some it&#039;s a gift card, others it&#039;s a t-shirt.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was approached by someone recently who offered cash in return for me writing about a client. I refused (and sent them links to several strongly worded posts on the subject) but in place of me, they found at least 10 bloggers to write for them. Companies will realise that this isn&#039;t the way to approach online media. But only when bloggers stop being bought. They&#039;re as much to blame as anyone else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This happens more often than bloggers like to admit. But where do you draw the line? At a cash sum, or when you&#39;re get a gift or something to review? Everyone has their price and for some it&#39;s a gift card, others it&#39;s a t-shirt.</p>
<p>I was approached by someone recently who offered cash in return for me writing about a client. I refused (and sent them links to several strongly worded posts on the subject) but in place of me, they found at least 10 bloggers to write for them. Companies will realise that this isn&#39;t the way to approach online media. But only when bloggers stop being bought. They&#39;re as much to blame as anyone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siany</title>
		<link>http://reputationonline.co.uk/2010/02/04/loft-bribes-bloggers-for-positive-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-1911</link>
		<dc:creator>Siany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 20:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reputationonline.co.uk/?p=2663#comment-1911</guid>
		<description>This is happening more frequently than bloggers admit (although not by myself). But, I have been approached by companies offering goodies or cash in exchange for blog posts. But that&#039;s where the problem lies. When is it OK to get &#039;samples&#039; from a company, rather than cash? I guess everyone decides what their price is. For some, it&#039;s a gift card or cash, for others it&#039;s a t-shirt or some such thing. The lines are blurred.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I refused to work with someone who wanted to pay me to write a blog post about a client (and sent them links to several strongly worded blog posts about the subject). They understood, but after a bit more hunting, they found 10 more bloggers to take my place. It&#039;s not OK for companies to do this, and when their brand is brought into question they&#039;ll realise that. But a lot of the fault lies with bloggers who take the money in the first place. And that doesn&#039;t look set to change any time soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is happening more frequently than bloggers admit (although not by myself). But, I have been approached by companies offering goodies or cash in exchange for blog posts. But that&#39;s where the problem lies. When is it OK to get &#39;samples&#39; from a company, rather than cash? I guess everyone decides what their price is. For some, it&#39;s a gift card or cash, for others it&#39;s a t-shirt or some such thing. The lines are blurred.</p>
<p>I refused to work with someone who wanted to pay me to write a blog post about a client (and sent them links to several strongly worded blog posts about the subject). They understood, but after a bit more hunting, they found 10 more bloggers to take my place. It&#39;s not OK for companies to do this, and when their brand is brought into question they&#39;ll realise that. But a lot of the fault lies with bloggers who take the money in the first place. And that doesn&#39;t look set to change any time soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
