<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube&#8217;s sports reputation rockets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reputationonline.co.uk/2010/01/19/youtubes-sports-reputation-rockets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reputationonline.co.uk/2010/01/19/youtubes-sports-reputation-rockets/</link>
	<description>Reputationonline.co.uk weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:38:12 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ReputationOnline</title>
		<link>http://reputationonline.co.uk/2010/01/19/youtubes-sports-reputation-rockets/comment-page-1/#comment-2086</link>
		<dc:creator>ReputationOnline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reputationonline.co.uk/?p=2467#comment-2086</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re completely right, and we&#039;ve just put the wrong word in that sentence. Thanks for pointing it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#39;re completely right, and we&#39;ve just put the wrong word in that sentence. Thanks for pointing it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjgibson</title>
		<link>http://reputationonline.co.uk/2010/01/19/youtubes-sports-reputation-rockets/comment-page-1/#comment-2087</link>
		<dc:creator>mjgibson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reputationonline.co.uk/?p=2467#comment-2087</guid>
		<description>Given Google&#039;s record of taking £2.1bn in revenues in the UK and actually getting tax back by siphoning income off to Ireland and then Bermuda but keeping its costs here &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/1892AO&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/1892AO&lt;/a&gt; I&#039;m not one of the Google&#039;s many doe-eyed &#039;aren&#039;t they great&#039; congregation. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However even Google aren&#039;t stupid enough to lose $470 million a month. Firstly the figure Credit Suisse was $470 million a YEAR. Even then that&#039;s a big loss. And that could be that if it wasn&#039;t for the on-going legal action by Viacom. Their filing imply that Google is making money on You Tube and, likes its revenue and tax, likes to hide its figures away from prying eyes. &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/aIDhqw&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/aIDhqw&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The reality is that the IPL will probably help generate yet more income AND profit for You Tube and Google and at the same time take on the likes of pay-per-view businesses run by the likes of Rupert Murdoch, who of course despises Google for underming his print media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given Google&#39;s record of taking £2.1bn in revenues in the UK and actually getting tax back by siphoning income off to Ireland and then Bermuda but keeping its costs here <a href="http://bit.ly/1892AO" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/1892AO</a> I&#39;m not one of the Google&#39;s many doe-eyed &#39;aren&#39;t they great&#39; congregation. </p>
<p>However even Google aren&#39;t stupid enough to lose $470 million a month. Firstly the figure Credit Suisse was $470 million a YEAR. Even then that&#39;s a big loss. And that could be that if it wasn&#39;t for the on-going legal action by Viacom. Their filing imply that Google is making money on You Tube and, likes its revenue and tax, likes to hide its figures away from prying eyes. <a href="http://bit.ly/aIDhqw" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/aIDhqw</a>. </p>
<p>The reality is that the IPL will probably help generate yet more income AND profit for You Tube and Google and at the same time take on the likes of pay-per-view businesses run by the likes of Rupert Murdoch, who of course despises Google for underming his print media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
