<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Protecting your ideas: the results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reputationonline.co.uk/2009/10/22/protecting-your-ideas-the-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reputationonline.co.uk/2009/10/22/protecting-your-ideas-the-results/</link>
	<description>Reputationonline.co.uk weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:38:12 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://reputationonline.co.uk/2009/10/22/protecting-your-ideas-the-results/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reputationonline.co.uk/?p=1189#comment-90</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by rep_online: New post: Protecting your ideas: the results http://bit.ly/b4kPj...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by rep_online: New post: Protecting your ideas: the results <a href="http://bit.ly/b4kPj..." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/b4kPj&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://reputationonline.co.uk/2009/10/22/protecting-your-ideas-the-results/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reputationonline.co.uk/?p=1189#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Very interesting article. At the launch48 weekend just gone by we launched a new service which is aimed at precisely this sort of problem. We&#039;re not up and running yet, but the intention is to provide a service whereby when you send a pitch to a client, you can cc a copy to our service. We&#039;ll timestamp any attachments in the email and send you back a receipt containing the digital timestamp (we don&#039;t keep your data after that point). 

You can then tell your clients (in the form of a standard email disclaimer would be one way) that all materials sent have been protected in this way, which should deter them from ripping your materials off in the first place. If they do, then you can use the timestamp receipt to provide supporting evidence for your case in the event you do have to sue.

As I mentioned, we&#039;re still developing the initial concept so we&#039;d welcome feedback - particularly from anyone that has been previously caught in this situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting article. At the launch48 weekend just gone by we launched a new service which is aimed at precisely this sort of problem. We&#8217;re not up and running yet, but the intention is to provide a service whereby when you send a pitch to a client, you can cc a copy to our service. We&#8217;ll timestamp any attachments in the email and send you back a receipt containing the digital timestamp (we don&#8217;t keep your data after that point). </p>
<p>You can then tell your clients (in the form of a standard email disclaimer would be one way) that all materials sent have been protected in this way, which should deter them from ripping your materials off in the first place. If they do, then you can use the timestamp receipt to provide supporting evidence for your case in the event you do have to sue.</p>
<p>As I mentioned, we&#8217;re still developing the initial concept so we&#8217;d welcome feedback &#8211; particularly from anyone that has been previously caught in this situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention ReputationOnline » Blog Archive » Protecting your ideas: the results -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://reputationonline.co.uk/2009/10/22/protecting-your-ideas-the-results/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention ReputationOnline » Blog Archive » Protecting your ideas: the results -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reputationonline.co.uk/?p=1189#comment-86</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Vikki Chowney, Gordon O&#039;Neill and flannel, Reputation Online. Reputation Online said: New post: Protecting your ideas: the results http://bit.ly/b4kPj [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Vikki Chowney, Gordon O&#39;Neill and flannel, Reputation Online. Reputation Online said: New post: Protecting your ideas: the results <a href="http://bit.ly/b4kPj" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/b4kPj</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
